Post by airport expansion AGAIN on Dec 16, 2003 16:47:25 GMT -5
TRANSPORT Secretary Alistair Darling today gave the go-ahead for an extension for the runway at John Lennon Airport.
He told MPs: "We agree the airport at Liverpool should expand as projected and the runway be lengthened in the future, subject to conditions."
But he gave no timetable for the project and the airport has said it has no plans to expand the runway.
His white paper setting out an airports strategy for the next 30 years said: "Development of increased capacity at John Lennon within its existing boundary is supported, to be accompanied by improved access.
"There may also be a case for extending the runway provided this does not encroach on environmentally sensitive sites." Extra runways at Stansted and Birmingham airports were also expected to be included in the new aviation White Paper.
Liverpool airport has said it would prefer an extra runway at Heathrow. This would be better than Stanstead in terms of tapping into the international flight links market.
Airlines and airport operator the British Airports Authority (BAA) all prefer the Heathrow option.
Darling has kept the Heathrow option open, but in the meantime backs greater use of the two existing runways at the west London airport.
Liverpool JLA managing director Neil Pakey said today: ''This is a 30-year policy document and there is recognition that Liverpool should have an extension to the runway, although we have no plans at the moment to do that.
"The statement reflects the growing importance of the airport and the recognition that we should be able to access longer-haul markets like the USA.
"We don't envisage anything in the years to come."
His corporate affairs chief Robin Tudor said: "Our view is Stansted will do nothing for Liverpool, we wanted an extension at Heathrow because it would then free up capacity for regional airports like us to access Heathrow."
He told MPs: "We agree the airport at Liverpool should expand as projected and the runway be lengthened in the future, subject to conditions."
But he gave no timetable for the project and the airport has said it has no plans to expand the runway.
His white paper setting out an airports strategy for the next 30 years said: "Development of increased capacity at John Lennon within its existing boundary is supported, to be accompanied by improved access.
"There may also be a case for extending the runway provided this does not encroach on environmentally sensitive sites." Extra runways at Stansted and Birmingham airports were also expected to be included in the new aviation White Paper.
Liverpool airport has said it would prefer an extra runway at Heathrow. This would be better than Stanstead in terms of tapping into the international flight links market.
Airlines and airport operator the British Airports Authority (BAA) all prefer the Heathrow option.
Darling has kept the Heathrow option open, but in the meantime backs greater use of the two existing runways at the west London airport.
Liverpool JLA managing director Neil Pakey said today: ''This is a 30-year policy document and there is recognition that Liverpool should have an extension to the runway, although we have no plans at the moment to do that.
"The statement reflects the growing importance of the airport and the recognition that we should be able to access longer-haul markets like the USA.
"We don't envisage anything in the years to come."
His corporate affairs chief Robin Tudor said: "Our view is Stansted will do nothing for Liverpool, we wanted an extension at Heathrow because it would then free up capacity for regional airports like us to access Heathrow."